Reverse Roulette System Exposed
There are so many roulette systems out there and all of them claim to make you rich, but it can be very difficult to find one that actually works. A lot of people have been asking me about reverse roulette and if you can win big money with the Reverse Roulette System. Well, here is my answer with my reverse roulette review. If you have played or studied roulette for any length of time, you know all too well that the odds are fixed in the house’s favor. There seems to be no way to get around this. The addition of the zero (and double zero) to roulette wheels gives the bank an advantage of 2.70 percent (or 5.26%) on every spin. CLICK HERE To Make Big Money With Reverse Roulette Can You Turn The House Edge in Your Favor? That said, perhaps there is a way to turn the house edge to your advantage. Instead of trying to gain back losses by progressively betting more and more, what if you were to instead concentrate on increasing your probability of winning on each bet? That question has spurred a rash of theories known collectively as The Reverse Roulette System. The idea is that certain combinations of bets, when taken as a group, can actually decrease the possibility of a loss. For example, the odds of winning a bet placed on the first dozen are 12:37 or 32.43 percent. The odds of losing are 25:37 or 67.57 percent. The same is true of a bet placed on the first column; you will lose 67.57 percent of the time. However, the odds of losing if you place the two bets in combination are much different. You cover 20 of the 37 numbers, four of which overlap. Your odds of winning on those four are 4:37 or 10.81 percent. Sixteen of your covered numbers will result in a wash if they hit—neither a win nor a loss. Your odds of losing are based only on the remaining uncovered numbers, i.e., 17:37 or 45.95 percent. So you have decreased your possibility of losing. But you have also decreased the probability of a win. What would happen if you played the same twenty numbers straight up? When betting those numbers as a group, your odds of winning shoot up to 20:37 or 54.05 percent. Your odds of losing remain the same. In effect, you have traded the possibility of a double win on four numbers for the opportunity to win on an additional sixteen numbers. Is twenty units too much to wager on a single turn of the wheel? Then bet the same numbers as ten split bets. Or why not bet seven streets (rows) of three numbers and increase your winning odds to 21:37 or 56.76 percent? This type of thinking has led to the development of some fairly sophisticated software applications that claim to use compounding of bets, rather than progressions, to raise your winning odds as high as 75 percent. Reverse Roulette by Lou Underhill is among them. But whenever a strategy seems too good to be true it usually is. The downfall of this, and any roulette system, is when it is overplayed. In the short term, you can certainly win—albeit very, very slowly. As one player put it, “Although the system made a good steady profit, it was very much a case of three steps forward, two steps back.” One problem is that a win on twenty numbers played straight up nets 16-to-1 (35 units won minus 19 surrendered), while a loss costs a full twenty units. Even though the odds are in your favor on each spin, the attrition caused by losses can still eat away at your bankroll. Use caution when applying the reverse roulette system, and should be able to walk away from your sessions a winner. What if there was a reverse roulette system that didn't use aggressive forms of progression, and you didn't have to spend hours tracking spins, it was east to use, and it worked on online casinos. Would you be interested? CLICK HERE to discover more information. |
